Skip to main content
Cyber InsuranceRisk ManagementCybersecurityCost Analysis

Why Cyber Insurance Premiums Keep Rising

· By Ashkaan Hassan

Cyber insurance premiums have surged over the past several years, with many businesses seeing renewal increases of 50 to 100 percent or more. For Los Angeles companies budgeting for risk management, these increases are more than an inconvenience. They represent a fundamental shift in how the insurance market evaluates digital risk. Understanding why premiums keep climbing is the first step toward controlling your costs.

The Claims Explosion That Changed the Market

The cyber insurance market operated relatively smoothly through the mid-2010s. Premiums were low, applications were short, and carriers competed aggressively for new business. Then ransomware happened at scale. Between 2019 and 2022, ransomware attacks surged in both frequency and severity. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Internet Crime Complaint Center, reported cyber crime losses exceeded $10 billion in 2022 alone, a figure that likely understates the true total since many incidents go unreported.

Insurance carriers paid out billions in ransomware claims during this period. Some carriers exited the cyber insurance market entirely. Those that remained recalibrated their pricing to reflect the actual risk, not the optimistic projections that had kept premiums artificially low for years. The correction was overdue, and businesses felt the impact immediately at renewal time.

Ransomware Economics Drive the Math

Ransomware is the single largest driver of premium increases. The business model behind ransomware has matured into what security researchers call Ransomware-as-a-Service, where criminal organizations lease attack tools to affiliates who split the proceeds. This model has lowered the barrier to entry for attackers and increased the volume of attacks dramatically.

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has published extensive advisories documenting how ransomware groups now engage in double extortion, encrypting data and threatening to publish it if the ransom is not paid. This tactic increases the average claim size because businesses face both recovery costs and potential regulatory penalties from data exposure. When the average claim grows, premiums must follow.

Underwriting Has Gotten Stricter

Carriers did not just raise prices. They fundamentally changed how they evaluate applicants. Five years ago, a cyber insurance application might have been a two-page questionnaire. Today, many carriers require detailed technical assessments covering multi-factor authentication, endpoint detection, backup architecture, patch management cadence, and employee training programs.

Businesses that cannot demonstrate mature security controls face one of three outcomes: higher premiums to offset the perceived risk, coverage exclusions that limit what the policy actually pays for, or outright denial. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners has tracked this trend and noted that underwriters are increasingly using third-party security scoring services to independently verify what applicants claim on their applications.

Supply Chain Attacks Multiply the Exposure

A single vulnerability in a widely used software product can trigger thousands of insurance claims simultaneously. The MOVEit and SolarWinds incidents demonstrated how supply chain attacks create correlated losses across the insurance industry. When one event generates claims from hundreds of policyholders at the same time, it strains the financial reserves that carriers maintain to pay claims.

This correlation risk is something the insurance industry is still learning to model. Traditional insurance works because losses are independent. Your building fire does not cause your neighbor’s building fire. In cyber, one exploit can cascade across industries and geographies. Carriers price this uncertainty into premiums, and that uncertainty premium is significant.

Regulatory Fines Add to Claim Costs

The regulatory environment around data breaches has tightened considerably. California’s Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) gives consumers the right to sue for data breaches involving certain categories of personal information. Similar laws in other states and countries compound the exposure for businesses that operate across jurisdictions.

When a breach triggers not just recovery costs but also regulatory investigations, legal fees, notification expenses, and potential fines, the total claim value rises. Insurance carriers factor all of these downstream costs into their pricing models. For Los Angeles businesses handling consumer data, the regulatory dimension of cyber risk is a meaningful part of why premiums have increased.

The Reinsurance Market Passes Costs Through

Behind every cyber insurance carrier stands a reinsurer, a company that insures the insurer. The reinsurance market for cyber risk has contracted sharply as reinsurers reconsider how much cyber exposure they are willing to absorb. When reinsurance becomes more expensive or less available, primary carriers pass those costs through to policyholders.

This dynamic is largely invisible to the businesses buying coverage, but it is one of the most powerful forces pushing premiums upward. Until the reinsurance market develops more confidence in cyber risk modeling, this structural cost pressure will persist regardless of what individual businesses do to improve their security.

What Businesses Can Do to Manage Costs

Premium increases are not entirely outside your control. Businesses that demonstrate strong security practices consistently receive better pricing than those that treat cybersecurity as an afterthought. The most effective steps for managing premiums include implementing multi-factor authentication across all systems, deploying endpoint detection and response tools, maintaining immutable offsite backups with tested recovery procedures, running regular employee security awareness training, and documenting an incident response plan.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework provides a structured approach to building the security posture that underwriters reward with better pricing. Businesses that can point to a recognized framework and demonstrate ongoing compliance position themselves as lower-risk applicants.

Shopping Smart at Renewal

When renewal time approaches, preparation matters. Start the process 90 days before your policy expires rather than waiting for a last-minute quote. Gather documentation of your security improvements since the last renewal. Work with a broker who specializes in cyber risk rather than treating it as a commodity add-on to your general liability policy.

Consider adjusting your retention, the deductible equivalent in cyber policies, to bring premiums down while keeping catastrophic coverage in place. Evaluate whether your coverage limits still match your actual exposure, since over-insuring wastes money and under-insuring creates a false sense of security. A thoughtful approach to structuring your policy can offset some of the market-driven price increases.

The Market Will Stabilize but Premiums Will Not Return to Old Levels

Industry analysts expect the rate of premium increases to moderate as carriers gather more claims data and refine their models. However, the pricing of five years ago reflected an immature market that underestimated cyber risk. The current pricing, while painful, is closer to reflecting the actual cost of the risk being transferred. Businesses should plan for cyber insurance as a permanent and meaningful line item in their risk management budget.

The most productive response is to treat rising premiums not as an unavoidable tax but as a signal to invest in the security controls that reduce both your actual risk and your insurance costs simultaneously.

We Solve Problems helps Los Angeles businesses strengthen their cybersecurity posture and reduce cyber insurance premiums through targeted security improvements. Contact us for a free assessment of your current coverage readiness.

Related Services